It is a general guide for crafting stand-out conference paper abstracts.
So you want to answer the Call for Papers? It provides strategies for the information and presentation for the abstract, as well as types of the very best abstracts submitted to your 2012-2013 abstract selection committee for the ninth annual North Carolina State University graduate student history conference.
Typically, an abstract describes the topic you would like to present at the conference, highlighting your argument, evidence and contribution into the literature that is historical. Most commonly it is limited to 250-500 words. The phrase limit can be challenging: some graduate students usually do not fret on the short limit and hastily write and submit an abstract in the eleventh hour, which regularly hurts their odds of being accepted; other students make an effort to condense essay writer the Next Great American Novel into 250 words, which can be equally damning. Graduate students who approach the abstract early, plan accordingly, and carefully edit are those most frequently invited to present their research. For those who are intimidated by the project, don’t be – the abstract is a form that is fairly standardized of. Proceed with the guidelines that are basic and get away from common pitfalls and you’ll greatly improve your abstract.
Diligently follow all abstract style and formatting guidelines. Most CFPs will specify word or page length, and perhaps some layout or style guidelines. Some CFPs, however, will list very specific restrictions, including font, font size, spacing, text justification, margins, how to present quotes, just how to present authors and works, whether to include footnotes or not. Make certain you strictly stick to all guidelines, including submission instructions. If a CFP does not provide abstract style and formatting guidelines, it is generally appropriate to stay around 250 words – abstract committees read a lot of these things nor look fondly on comparatively long abstracts. Ensure that you orient your abstract topic to deal with any specific CFP themes, time periods, methods, and/or buzzwords.
With a 250-500 word limit, write only what is necessary, avoiding wordiness. Use active voice and focus on excessive prepositional phrasing.
Plan your abstract carefully before writing it. A abstract that is good address listed here questions: what’s the historical question or problem? Contextualize your topic. What is your thesis/argument? It must be original. What is your evidence? State forthrightly that you’re using primary source material. How exactly does your paper squeeze into the historiography? What are you doing in the field of study and how does your paper contribute to it? Why does it matter? We know this issue is essential for you, why should it is important to the selection committee that is abstract?
You ought to be as specific as you are able to, avoiding overly broad or statements that are overreaching claims. And that is it: don’t get sidetracked by writing a lot of narrative or over explaining. Say what you ought to say and nothing more.
Maintain your audience in your mind. How background that is much give on a subject is determined by the conference. Could be the conference a general humanities conference, a graduate that is general history conference, or something like that more specific like a 1960s social revolutions conference? Your pitch should really be suitable for the specificity associated with the conference: the more specific the subject, the less broad background you have to give and vice versa.
Revise and edit your abstract to ensure its final presentation is error free. The editing phase is also the time that is best to visit your abstract as a whole and chip away at unnecessary words or phrases. The draft that is final be linear and clear also it should read smoothly. If you should be tripping over something while reading, the selection that is abstract will as well. Ask another graduate student to learn your abstract to ensure its clarity or attend a Graduate Student Writing Group meeting.
Your language should be professional and your style should stick to standards that are academic. Contractions might be appealing due to the word limits, nevertheless they should be avoided. If citation guidelines are not specifically given, it is appropriate to use the author’s name and title of work (in either italics or quotation marks) inside the text as opposed to use footnotes or in-text citations.
While one question, if really good, could be posed in your abstract, you really need to avoid writing more than one (maybe two, if really really good). If you do pose a question or two, make sure that you either answer it or address why the question matters to your conference paper – unless you’re posing an obvious rhetorical question, you must never just let a question hang there. Way too many questions uses up a lot of space and leaves less room for you yourself to develop your argument, methods, evidence, historiography, etc. Often times, posing way too many questions leaves the abstract committee wondering if you are planning to address one or all in your paper if you even know the answers in their mind. Remember, you are not anticipated to have already written your conference paper, you are anticipated to own done enough research that you can adequately cover in 15-20 minutes that you are prepared to write about a specific topic. Demonstrate that you have inked so.
Language that will help you be as specific as you can in presenting your argument is great but don’t get your readers bogged down in jargon. They’ll certainly be reading lots of abstracts and will not desire to wade through the language that is unnecessary. Ensure that it it is simple.
When students repeat claims, they often don’t realize they are doing so. Sometimes this happens because students are not yet clear on the argument. Contemplate it some more and then write. In other cases, students write carelessly plus don’t proofread. Be sure each sentence is exclusive and therefore it plays a part in the flow of the abstract.
The abstract committee does not want to be reminded of the grand sweep of history in order to contextualize your topic. Place your topic specifically within the historiography.
The samples below represent the five scoring samples that are highest submitted into the selection committee for the ninth annual graduate student history conference, 2012-2013. Two associated with samples below were subsequently selected for publication when you look at the NC State Graduate Journal of History. Outstanding papers presented at the graduate student history conference are suitable for publication by panel commentators. Papers go through a peer review process before publication.